If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/dresslink0/activity/129557/ ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.