What is the safest distance from your 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For  safe distance from cell tower , a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.



But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.