If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. Continue reading include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.