If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
safe distance from cell tower are replacing larger built cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a cell tower but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.