If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
safe distance from cell tower are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
https://paste1s.com/notes/NX80A67 for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
