If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. safe distance to live from cell phone tower can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.