Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

https://pastelink.net/zhi7u9sc  are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.



This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

safe distance from cell tower  is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.