If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. https://www.theversed.com/members/touchloss9/activity/3549405/ is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
safe distance to live from cell phone tower ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.